A perspective on Senior Manager - Collaboration Platforms
Chicago, IL
The leadership I’d bring
Clear direction for the Collaboration team
I’d lead the team around clear priorities, reliable Microsoft 365 services and coordinated delivery. I bring experience turning complex work into shared plans, guiding decisions across technical and business teams, and helping people follow through.
The team has to keep Microsoft 365 services dependable and secure while improving how employees work across Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive and Outlook. I’d lead across that full responsibility, from engineering and modernization to service operations, governance and team development.
Direction and priorities
Set priorities the team can deliver
I’d build the roadmap with the team around business needs, service health and engineering capacity. I’d make the tradeoffs clear so modernization and automation move forward alongside reliable day-to-day support.
Delivery and accountability
Carry decisions through to results
I’d keep ownership, dependencies and readiness criteria visible from planning through release and support. Regular reviews would connect delivery progress, incident trends and unresolved decisions to the next action.
People and partnerships
Help the team do its best work
I’d set clear expectations, coach people through difficult problems and follow through on commitments. I’d engage Security, Infrastructure, Legal, Finance and business partners early, then give leadership a clear account of progress.
02 / Leadership in practice
You’ve seen how I bring structure to complex work
In our lifecycle workshops, I brought managers and specialists together around five phases: plan, procure, deploy, operate and dispose.
I shaped the preparation and leadership narrative so the discussions could focus on ownership, dependencies and the points ServiceNow needs to track. I helped turn those discussions into recommendations and requirements for owner validation and technical review.
What this demonstrates
I bring people around a common objective, make delivery choices understandable and turn discussion into work another team can execute. I’d bring that same discipline to the Collaboration team’s priorities and commitments.
A shared view of the lifecycle
Select a phase to see the questions I bring to the work.
Plan
Make the decision clear
What needs to change, and who can decide?
Confirm the business need, the scope and the owner. Identify the decisions needed before work begins.
CheckpointAgreed scope and accountable owner
Procure
Connect approval to the need
What are we approving, and what must be recorded?
Keep the business request, approval, entitlement and ownership information connected.
CheckpointApproved request and required records
Deploy
Define what ready means
What has to be true before the change is released?
Identify dependent work, technical validation, support ownership and employee communication.
CheckpointValidated change and agreed handoff
Operate
Keep ownership visible
How will we know the service is working as intended?
Agree what to monitor, who handles issues and which exceptions need a decision.
CheckpointService expectations and follow-up
Dispose
Close the full loop
What needs to be retired, reclaimed or recorded?
Coordinate retirement, access changes and record updates. Confirm that the responsible owners have completed their steps.
CheckpointConfirmed retirement and updated records
An illustration of my working approach, not internal operating records.
Platform judgment
Question the constraint
In a SharePoint modernization discussion, I helped distinguish platform work from application changes, ownership and funding decisions. That clarified what needed input from technical specialists and business owners.
Operating structure
Make follow-through visible
I created an engagement tracker for our business process team so requests, owners, dates and updates were visible together. The working record helped the team identify missing assignments and follow up on missing information.
Leadership responsibility
Develop people and earn trust
I’ve mentored an intern and a former apprentice as they developed in their roles. My manager has trusted me to represent her in an executive steering committee.
03 / Judgment across teams
Bring the right people into the decision
In software asset management (SAM), I’ve helped scale the program through clearer ownership, priorities, requirements and leadership reporting.
A purchasing contact isn’t always the person accountable for a product’s use. A large spend figure isn’t automatically a savings opportunity. Those distinctions shape how I organize the work and explain it to leadership.
A distinct perspective for Collaboration
I’d connect platform decisions with SAM, Finance and business owners. The team would have a clear basis for licensing choices and a leadership message that separates confirmed results from opportunities.
How I’d work through a license decision
Three situations. A connected approach to each.
An illustrative decision
A team requests more Copilot licenses
Understand the need
Confirm the work people need to do, the access already available and any licenses that can be reassigned.
Agree the next action
Bring the business owner, platform team, SAM and Finance into the decision. Give new users a practical path to their first useful task.
The leadership message
Here’s the confirmed need, the recommended allocation and how we’ll review use.
An illustrative decision
Assigned licenses show limited activity
Understand the need
Confirm the reporting period, business need and any changes in the employee’s role. Find out whether they need help getting started.
Agree the next action
Agree whether to support the employee, retain access or reclaim the license. Record the decision and validate the change with the platform team.
The leadership message
Here’s what we reviewed, what needs support and what can be reassigned.
An illustrative decision
A renewal needs an informed recommendation
Understand the need
Bring purchased rights, assignments, usage, confirmed future needs and contract timing into one view.
Agree the next action
Work with owners to resolve uncertain demand. Separate potential savings, cost avoidance and confirmed financial results before recommending a renewal position.
The leadership message
Here’s what we need to retain, what can change and which decisions remain open.
Illustrative situations and proposed actions. No internal license data.
A decision needs an owner and a next step
I’d bring that same discipline to platform changes and service improvements. A clear recommendation should lead to an agreed action, a responsible owner and a check that the change worked.
04 / Initiative and Copilot enablement
Help people build better ways of working
6 Copilot agents I builtAbout 100 requests per agent so far
I’m Technology’s Everyday AI Change Champion representative and a generative AI subject-matter expert. I was a founder of the United GPT Community of Practice and now help lead Microsoft Copilot adoption through workshops, guidance and coaching.
My Copilot agents show how I take a recurring business need, create a usable solution and help others apply it. I’d bring that same initiative to the Collaboration team’s automation and improvement work.
Featured agent
Possibilities
131 total requests
AI that starts with what’s on your plate
I built Possibilities to identify relevant deliverables and use cases from an employee’s accessible work context. It explains why each opportunity fits and prepares a detailed prompt to carry it forward.
What I designed
I connected work context, evidence and useful next actions in one reusable agent.
Try the actual agent
01
Find relevant work
02
Select useful opportunities
03
Prepare detailed prompts
Starter prompt
Show me the possibilities of Copilot and generative AI.
I built One-Pager to turn a meeting, file or business issue into a visual first draft. The person reviews and refines it for the audience before using it.
What I designed
I shaped the instructions around clear content, visual organization and human review.
I built Problem Definer to help colleagues examine the business problem behind a request. It turns scattered context into a problem statement, contributing factors and open questions.
What I designed
I translated a problem-definition method developed with a colleague into a reusable agent.
Try the actual agent
01
Examine the request
02
Separate facts and assumptions
03
Frame the real problem
Starter prompt
Create a problem statement from: [meeting / file / topic]
I built Pressure Tester in response to a request from my managing director. It examines an idea’s strengths, weaknesses, risks and alternatives before the team commits to a path.
What I designed
I made constructive challenge repeatable so the discussion can move beyond agreeing with the first proposal.
My family arrived in California on a United flight when I was a baby. Years later, United helped me visit my future wife in Morocco. I still remember how the welcome in Polaris made a demanding journey feel easier.
I care about the people and systems that make that experience possible.
Let’s talk about what the team needs next
I’d like to bring the leadership you’ve seen in our shared work to the broader Collaboration team. I’d welcome a few minutes to discuss your priorities, the team’s needs and how I could help lead its next stage.